Recent Posts

How Great Leaders ACTUALLY Lead Small Teams: Actionable Tips!


How Great Leaders Lead Small Teams

My most recent small team was a high-performing unit of six; this was the most exhaustive and intense time as a leader I had experienced. Previously, I led teams of 100+, but my time as a manager and commander for this team was by far the most challenging.

I learned a lot from my mistakes training other leaders and watching their results.

First, let’s look at what small-team leadership is:

Small team leadership (STL) is “the art of leading small teams.” Small teams are groups of two to ten people working together towards a common goal. The best small team leaders focus on understanding team members’ strengths and weaknesses and understanding employees’ “why.” 

Small team leaders know exactly how to communicate with each individual so that the organization’s goals can be met while maintaining high morale and employee engagement.

Small team leadership is unique, and in this post, I want to make sure you stay clear of the biggest mistakes and execute flawlessly on the mission critical:

What Is Unique With Being The Leader of a Small Team?

What Is Unique With Being The Leader of a Small Team?
The uniqueness of being a small team leader

As the leader of a small team, you will have more one-on-one time with the individuals of your team, or at least you should have; this means they will be able to see all aspects of you, as a leader, as a friend, and as a human being.

This forges trust fast, If, and this is a big one, If you are an authentic and proficient leader.

Since all your moves will be visible to your team, you can not hide behind the masses of a large group. Your team will watch your every move, and they will compare your talk with your walk. And if these align and are also accepted by the crew, then you my friend, are driving a Ferrari on the highway of organizational goals.

The power of this intimate connection is many times overlooked. I have seen many team leader colleagues assume that whoever is on their team is there because they want to. This a big mistake because assuming such a vital component could set you up for some severe employee retainment issues.

One of the best ways to become a prominent small team leader is to avoid the great mistakes made by others, and by others, I mean myself…

How to Kill Performance On a Small Team!

How to Kill Performance On a Small Team!
Burnout is real!

Small teams are better at innovation and creativity, but this is not a given! If you do not avoid the following mistakes, you will be creating a very tough situation to lead from. 

These are lessons from 14 years of leading but also from being led and developing new leaders.

Here are four things you must avoid if you want to be an effective small-team leader! 

4 things to avoid for effective small-team leadership
4 things to avoid for effective small-team leadership

1. Not Knowing EXACTLY WHY People Show Up for Work

During my time as a Bomb Disposal operator, the norm was that teams did one deployment together and then split up, either leaving the army or doing something else within the arms.

My team stayed together for five years and four deployments, longer than any other team in the history of my company, and the secret?

Understand WHY your people ACTUALLY show up for work and find ways that you can nurture that drive.

Here’s an example: I had a team member whose greatest drive was to have a feeling of belonging, not to feel like he was dispensable. Knowing this, I did my best to create a stable environment (by army measure) so that we all could feel at home within the team.

Building a team is like building a very strong ship, no matter the storms surrounding you, on your ship, you will all be safe.

In combination with a few other factors (that you can read about here), this is the absolute most powerful way to keep people on your team forever! 

2. Not Understanding Each Individual’s Specific Needs

I learned this the hard way. I pushed a team member too hard, and he mentally crashed, bursting into tears in front of the whole team. I felt ashamed and had failed as a leader; if I had talked less and listened more, it would have become evident to me that he needed recovery and a helping hand.

Not a pushing hand…

If we crash, it takes 10x more time to repair than if we slow down, do the necessary maintenance and avoid the crash entirely.

We, as leaders, must listen and anticipate what our people need; this is different from giving them whatever they ask for. Now, as the leader, it is your duty to look beyond what they say they want and give them what they really need.

It’s a fine line between overparenting and not taking responsibility.

3. Unable To See Specific Strengths and Weaknesses

Your understanding of your teammates can be compared to the individual materials of a machine. If we make the cogs out of plastic and the steering wheel from metal, we will have a pretty useless car.

But when we understand the characteristics of the plastic and metal that make up our “leadership car,” we can utilize it more effectively. Not knowing your team’s strengths and weaknesses is like building a car with unknown materials.

You MUST Exploit your team’s strength, and leverage it to the moon! Your weaknesses, on the other hand only need to be “good enough”!

4. Hiding From The Team

I remember the first encounter with my new team, they were out practicing skills, and I was to lead them through a task for the first time. I was nervous, and I had volunteered for it. I knew they would watch my every move and that this situation had the potential to really screw up my start with them.

I wanted to say, “I don’t have time right now,” and hide in my office, but I knew “showing up” was important, so I went out and gave it my best. A few years later, I got this comment from a former teammate of that team:

“You were the ONLY one who came out and revealed yourself, we [the teams] respected that!”

My takeaway? It’s scary to be a leader, especially an authentic small team leader, where the boundaries between family and colleagues can be very blurry. But if you nail it, your team becomes something to be proud of and valuable for the rest of your life.

Now that we have explored the big pitfalls of small team leadership, it is time to look at better options to lead.

Real-World Tips on How to Effectively Lead a Small Team

Real-World Tips on How to Effectively Lead a Small Team
Trust keeps the team together

Build REAL Trust

You have probably heard that trust is the glue that keeps the team together. While this makes partial sense, trust is way more than just keeping people together. 

Trust is a shortcut to productivity, trust removes stress and anxiety, trust enables creativity, and trust IS the team.

“If there is no SOLID trust on the team, I would say you don’t have a team; what you have is a gathering of people.”

Solid trust, forged through healthy conflict and continuous feedback, will make your team ask fewer questions because they know that if they get it wrong, the team will have their back; this means a higher-paced work environment and greater output.

And if you build your team with genuine care in mind, long-term and authentic care, that is, then there will be no more Sunday anxiety before work, or the meetings will feel much more honest and productive.

Trust is setting your team up for “useable failure.” Let me explain. In some aspects, your team will fail. That’s just how the world works. Now either you can have a culture that makes people hide the small mistakes, so you can’t learn from them, leading to big mistakes and significant failures.

Or, every time someone makes, what you think is a mistake, you assume that it was incompetence rather than malevolence. The fix for incompetence is training, and the fix for malevolence is something totally different.

“Never assume malevolence if incompetence is enough to explain the problem.”

Communicate Goals Clearly and Precisely

If you think defining goals isn’t a big deal and that there are more important skills that you need to work on as a leader, then I ask you this:

In one sentence: tell me your top target, purpose, and requirements.

If you can’t quickly and clearly state EXACTLY what it is you are supposed to achieve, how can you expect others to work in your “spirit” and direction? After 12+ years as an Army officer, guiding all types of units, this is one of the key components to getting the right things done on time.

If your team understands What is important (Top target), they understand Why it is important (purpose), and they know what SPECIFIC actions lead to success (requirements). As a leader, you can start clearing obstacles (contingency planning) for your team to do their thing, and you can now plan for the future, so when the task is complete or the situation changes, you already have a direction for where to go.

That’s great leadership!

Strengthen ALL That is Good and Hinder What is Bad

Maybe you have heard, “You need to work on your weaknesses.” or “Make your faults your strengths.” I say, screw that. Why would you put your energy where you are having the least success?

Let’s say you are the commander of an attacking unit trying to break through enemy lines. Suddenly you get two reports; one states, “We are struggling with logistics and aren’t achieving our objectives,” and the other states, “We are pushing forward, and the enemy seems to be on its back foot.”

What would you do? Hopefully, you said, “Let’s go strengthen the offense and achieve a decisive victory on the battlefield!” But from experience, I know that many leaders out there choose to be the eternal repairman, continuously trying to fix what is broken, putting energy into fixing those logistics, and making sure everything is equal.

This is the wrong way of doing it. If we understand the overarching goals, winning the fight (or selling products, for that matter), then we must do the things that get us closer to the win, not something that just keeps us in the fight.

So exploit your strengths and accept your weaknesses if you want success with your top goals. Select your priorities and honor them.

“If everything is important, nothing is important.”

Understand Accumulative Stress

I once made the mistake of thinking, “How can he be so tired and stressed when we’ve had such a slow week?” Maybe you have done something similar? This is a very common mistake that I see. Our team must be seen in relation to everything else that is going on in their lives.

There are obvious stressful things, such as the death of a close one, and usually, we as leaders are pretty good at understanding that. But there are way more subtle and hard-to-see stressors; maybe they don’t even see it themselves yet.

A few years back, I had a close friend and a team leader performing differently than usual. For months, this low performance would continue. When we sat down to talk, he would mention being tired, which is very normal considering the high-paced environment we were in, and we couldn’t find anything unusual.

This could have resulted in treating him as an underperformer and taking him off the team leader position. But instead, we chose to start diving deeper and broader into understanding where this originated from. After many hours of talking and a few trips to the medical facility, it turned out he had a very rare, nonsymptomatic disease probably caused by being bitten by a tic.

He quickly got back into shape, and his performance was through the roof.

We got many things out of this situation. We forged trust by not giving up on each other. We didn’t have to find someone else to train and replace him, and we built a culture in the organization that we ACTUALLY value our people!

Create a Culture of True Openness

Ever had one of those after-meeting discussions? One where the real issues pop up, one where people say, “This is crazy,” or “I can’t believe how stupid this is.” Why do you think people suddenly open up? Why didn’t they say anything during the meeting?

I mean, that’s what the meeting was for, and the manager has often said that we have an open climate where we can talk about anything…

Of course, there are some logistical matters, such as there wasn’t enough time.

But the real issue is usually a combination of two things: first, you have probably heard or felt, “My opinion doesn’t matter, so why should I say anything anyways,” the second, “If I say something, I’m afraid how people will think.”

Here’s food for thought; the latter isn’t about “What people will think about me.” It’s about “How will people treat me.” That’s a big difference and a topic for another day.

Self-censured team culture is a BIG deal. It will screw your entire team or organization’s narrative, and it will generate a straight path to group thinking and basically kill creativity and innovation.

“It will screw your entire team or organization narrative and it is a striaght path to group think and basically kills all creativity and innovation.”

Many times this comes sneaking from the dark. The manager often has the best intentions and truly wants an open climate and a marketplace of ideas. But what most managers need to see is if you only reinforce useful ideas and always XXXX on non-useful ones.

Then slowly but surely, you are molding the narrative and the discussions to only encourage ideas that people think that you or the group will immediately approve of.

The key here is to not explicitly judge the ideas that are coming in. You don’t have to encourage the idea, but you must encourage the process of generating the idea!

“You dont have to encourage the idea, but you must encourage the process of generating the idea!”

You will get more of whatever you encourage, and the opposite is also true. So if you genuinely want an open climate, you must encourage the individual who generated the idea, even if you think the idea is stupid and not worthwhile.

And this is true. Most ideas, maybe even 99%, are useless, but that isn’t the point. The 1% idea, the Google or the Tesla of ideas, is worth all the stupid ideas. If you want to access the 1% of great ideas, you must be prepared to face “the 99%” as well. You do this by removing obstacles (self-censorship), allowing the free marketplace of ideas to grow.

Use Facetime Wisely

A lot of us are working remotely, at least in part. This is very comfortable for the individual, but it makes forging your team much harder for you as a leader.

It’s like chatting with your Tinder date for two weeks, and when the date finally happens, you realize in two seconds that there is zero chemistry, you don’t like the same jokes, and your communication tempo is way off.

In the case of the date, you’ll probably just say thank you and never see each other again, but on a team, it’s different, right?

In-person time is unbeatable when it comes to getting to know someone. Slack, zoom, or whatever you use is, at best, a 1% solution when building rapport and understanding with the people you serve.

It should be a priority of you, as a leader, to meet each and every one of your team regularly!

The hierarchy of communications is something like this;

  1. In-person 1on1
  2. In-person group
  3. Videocall 1on1
  4. Audio call 1on1
  5. Videocall Group
  6. Audio call Group
  7. Text (email, or whatever) 

You want to work as high up as possible as often as possible. Make this time a high-value target (don’t do the classic team-building crap). The aim here isn’t to solve specific business problems (even though that’s what you physically will be doing). Instead, it is to let your people understand you as a leader and for you to understand your people’s needs, wants, strengths, and weaknesses.

Ultimately, this is an exercise in forging team trust. 

Basically, I see it like this; 10 hours of 1on1 Zoom calls equals 1 hour of actual face-to-face time when it comes to building rapport and trust.

1h(Zoom) = 10h(1on1)

This can be multiplied 10x when the activity includes something challenging and time for reflection is added.

1h(Zoom) = 10h(1on1) * 10

Start engaging with your team deeply and profoundly, and you’ll discover relationships and performance on a different level.

Lead Individuals, Not Groups

If you are leading a team, then you are making a big mistake.

As a manager (and hopefully a leader), you are responsible for two things: the team’s well-being and task completion. But instead of leading a team, you should be leading individuals!

This might sound insignificant initially, but if you’re making this mistake, you’re losing out on the performance multiplier of trust and sub-conscious understanding among teammates.

And you’ll most likely get overwhelmed with questions about how and why things should be done.

The small team leaders’ greatest leverage over large team leaders is the ability to lead individuals. We can understand each person’s greatest strengths and weaknesses and build the team to maximize our strengths and limit our weaknesses!

But this can only be done when we understand and know our people, which is inaccessible to large teams due to time constraints and the slow feedback loop.

Here’s an example, let’s say it takes 100h of quality face time (1on1 with effective informal feedback) to build basic trust between individuals. Let’s say it’s twice as much during group time (up to 10ppl); 200h.

This means for every group of ten people you want to build trust with, you need 40 weeks of 5h quality Facetime (40*5=200h). It is possible to build basic trust on a small team within a year, but almost impossible on a large team unless you dedicate a large portion of the workweek to building your team, which most people don’t.

Being in charge of a small team allows you to become a leader that people want to follow truly. But as the head of a large team, you will most likely be doomed for eternal managing.

“Being in charge of a small team allows you to truly become the leader that people want to follow.”

Assign Somebody the Number 2 Position

Coming from a military background, this is something that I am always surprised about in the private sector; there is rarely a “second in command” on a team.

There are multiple benefits to having a “number 2” on your team:

First, this is a great way to train the next team leader, slowly making sure he or she is getting better at leading and understanding what it takes to be in charge. Start by handing over small subtasks, such as leading a presentation or holding a meeting.

Secondly, it allows the “number 1” to free up time to focus on the future. As stated earlier, the team’s mission is to focus right here, right now, and the leader tilts his head up to see what is coming.

Thirdly, it creates a situation where everyone sees that there are more responsibilities and tasks to be had. For a few, this is scary, but some will answer the call to adventure.

Train Your Team on Useful Feedback

How to give a correct Feedback

In the great book Thinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman, he emphasized how important feedback is in becoming an expert in a field. And it doesn’t even matter what field it is. Timely and accurate feedback is vital for individual success and, therefore, is a foundational skill in a well-developed team.

There is a story about Kahneman and his team working with fighter pilots. The flight instructors argued that praising someone after a good flight made them fly poorly the next run, but screaming at them when performing poorly actually made them better!

After a poor performance by one of the pilots, the instructor corrected with some good ol’ yelling. During the next flight, his performance increased! So the screaming worked, right?

The studies of Kahneman proved that this is a problem of small data sets, and it is instead a phenomenon called “regression to the mean.” After any spike in performance (low or high), there will be a return to normal performance, aka regression to the mean performance.

Whether or not the instructor was yelling, after any peak or trough in performance, there was a regression.

If this is your way of feedback, then the next couple of tips will be very useful! 

Don’t worry, this is extremely common at almost every workplace, but it is possible to fix it so that the long-term trajectory is upwards and that you save time being angry when you see low performance!

The lack of effective feedback usually leads to two things, either there is no feedback at all, and whatever bad behaviors exist will thrive and become a stronger and stronger habit. Or, the feedback is of such low quality, so at best, it doesn’t have any effect (fighter pilot example) or, at worst, creates resentment within the team since it is mainly offensive and non-constructive.

The latter example is horrible since it tends to create situations where people start talking behind each other’s backs instead of constructive communication between conflicting individuals.

Both will kill the performance of your team!

Instead, I recommend that you train your team on authentic feedback. Feedback is a subset of communication skills and can be trained. I taught my team daily with small communications challenges (incorporated into our everyday tasks) so that we would give valuable and effective feedback that the receiver would accept.

It took a while, but it truly is a great tool! 

However, I learned that I could create a shortcut to good feedback by using a simple script. Using this script/template made sure that we hit every note that good feedback needs to hit to be accepted. It took a while, but it truly is a great tool!

The script is not published on this site, but if you send me an email, I’ll reply with a copy!

Based on my experience, once you figure this out, a few things will happen; firstly, you will build a much deeper connection and trust within your team. Secondly, this will create a situation of “psychological safety.” And thirdly, all of this sparks the confidence in your team to take risks!

This is where the magic happens, new ideas will be brought to the surface, and old ideas will be improved upon! 

Here are the basic phases I use when training my teams on effective feedback.

Phase 0. Build individual integrity and strength so that all employees/teammates can handle feedback, even if it’s rough and poorly communicated. (This is vital!)

Phase 1. Teach a basic script so feedback entails all the necessary components for acceptability and understandability.

Phase 2. Train your team on feedback timing and different methods of giving feedback.

Phase 3. Take down the obstacle and the culture that prevents clear communication.

A true friend tells you when you are being an idiot.

Create Feedback Opportunities

Maybe you’ve heard about a feedback form where one person leaves the room, the rest discuss their opinions, and then present them to the person. Have you thought about this but been discouraged because it’s too rough or makes people feel bad?

Then your team probably has issues with trust, or your team isn’t adequately trained to perform such a powerful exercise yet. And that’s okay. Train your people and yourself, and when you are ready, here’s a very powerful way of building trust and keeping minor issues from becoming problems.

A few years back, I sat down with my team and asked them individually how they best received and gave feedback. All but one said spontaneously during my day. The last one said, by formally sitting down and talking about it.

I’m happy he said that. It turned out to be an excellent way for us to communicate all the small conflicts and stop them before they impaired our performance. In comparison to all other teams in the organization, we never had a big “fight” because our method was to solve the small issues fast instead of repairing the damages caused by huge conflicts. And we succeeded mainly because of the systems we set up.

So we set up a date and time to regularly give each other authentic feedback (1-three month intervals) where we would gather with the honest intent to help each other become better and more self-aware humans.

As an added benefit, we gained deep trust and a feeling of genuine care for each other.

In general, the exercise goes something like this:

  1. The feedback receiver leaves the room.
  2. During the 20min, the others discuss their strengths, weaknesses, potential areas of conflict, specific observations, and questions they may have. 
  3. The receiver returns, one person delivers the questions or thoughts, and the receiver asks clarifying questions. ( the mission is to understand, not agree or disagree).
  4. The receiver summarizes the feedback and asks: is this what you meant?
  5. If the others say “yes,” then you move on to the next receiver.
  6. If no, then more questions are asked until the message is clear.

If you want a complete step-by-step of this method, contact me via email or social media, and I’ll send you a copy.

How to effectively lead a small team
How to effectively lead a small team

Sources

https://go.frontier.com/business/blog/tips-for-leading-a-small-team-effectively/

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0007681304001120

https://medium.com/psychology-in-action/feedback-the-secret-weapon-for-acquiring-expertise-d9a54def6ead

https://www.nytimes.com/guides/business/manage-a-successful-team

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-0941-9?wpisrc=

Improve Your Public Speaking in 4 Simple Steps (for Leaders/Managers)


How Do Leaders Improve Public Speaking? (4 Simple Steps)

The work of renowned philosopher Aristotle outlines the importance of rhetoric — how speeches appeal to emotion, character, and reason – ingredients necessary in any managerial act. Consider the budding entrepreneur, too; how a business journey and entry point in an industry starts with the power of a single product pitch.

Improving public speaking involves thoroughly understanding its importance in business, preparation, and a business presence. Today’s corporate strategies — including research and development and academia management — demand that leaders be well-versed in communication and presentation skills.

This article will detail steps to improve public speaking, including addressing misconceptions. I’ll also discuss practical tips for improving your public speaking skills.

How Can a Leader Improve Public Speaking?

An effective leader is an effective speaker.
An effective leader is an effective speaker.

As a leader shines in a role — from an individual standpoint into managing a team — one will encounter various situations and find oneself maneuvering from one client to another, from one goal to the next.

A leader can improve his public speaking skills by preparing for the speech in advance and scripting it based on their knowledge of its place in business. Great public speakers also use non-verbal cues like eye contact, hand gestures, and posture to communicate effectively.

Steps to improve your public speaking
4 simple steps to improve your public speaking

Here are the steps to improve your public speaking.

1. Understand the Place Public Speaking Holds in Leadership

Look at the common factor among influential leaders and see how effective public speaking skills have become a crucial management act. Public speaking is, in many ways, a business component — it allows leaders to solve problems and maintain a positive public image.

The first step in effective public speaking is knowing its leadership role. Knowing its essential role in impacting others and improving trustworthiness will allow you to place the appropriate amount of effort into your speech.

A leader who values public speaking as a managerial tool will likely appreciate its importance.

A leader who values public speaking as a managerial tool will likely appreciate its importance.

2. Come Prepared Before Any Public Speaking Engagement

Especially for leaders managing small teams, preparing in advance is an excellent way to improve. Crucial in speech preparations is the ability to outline several talking points and practice these ideas several times.
Remember the six P’s; Proper Planning Prevents Piss Poor Performance.

Remember the six P´s; Proper Planning Prevents Piss Poor Performance,

Other leaders always come prepared with a meeting agenda, even sending it to their team before a meeting. Some also create note cards or presentation notes as a way of backup.

Some leaders also opt to practice with a peer to get their feedback. Use this time to ensure that all talking points are covered, including your voice’s inflections, while guaranteeing friendliness and sincerity in your tone.

Important to include in your preparations is the capacity to be comfortable with eye contact if you aren’t already.

Leaders should be able to look their team members straight in the eye to grab their attention and emphasize important points. Don’t talk to the crowd; speak to the individuals in the crowd!
Don’t talk to the crowd; talk to the individuals in the crowd!

Remember to employ appropriate body language and facial expressions. Leaders should be able to communicate significant points, including how a message should “stick.”
Preparing notes or cue cards in advance is a great way to rehearse your speech without appearing too scripted. It also allows for some improvisation, letting audience members participate or ask questions.

3. Always Keep “Business Presence” in Mind

Business professionals refer to a unique quality they call “professional presence” or business presence, believing that any manager with this quality has a competitive advantage above the rest. A huge part of this professional presence relates to how a leader speaks.

Research suggests building a great impression of expertise and reliability based on your verbal and nonverbal messages.

First, be mindful of your demeanor and posture when you enter a room and sit in front of an audience. Even walking to a podium must be done with purpose and confidence.

Experts also suggest having a meaningful pause to calm the nerves and look pleasant. This technique equips the speaker with confidence and allows for precise and natural speech.

Lastly, ensuring an effective business presence involves avoidance of distracting mannerisms. A way to prevent nervousness is to focus on your message, allowing you to ignore your anxiety.

4. Avoid Falling Into the Trap of Public Speaking Misconceptions

Effective public speakers know better than to believe misconceptions.

For one, most believe that speaking does not involve listening — but active listening is crucial to being an excellent conversationalist. Active listening involves listening to others for understanding rather than responding.

A related macro skill to speaking is reading. Some believe reading has no place in public speaking, but that is incorrect.

Any speaker will improve their speaking abilities with more publications read. These stories and experiences become compelling anecdotes and illustrations for future speaking engagements and business presentations.

Leaders should ensure that they find time to read. For example, look for stories you know will connect with your team or audience, something they can relate to.

Lastly, avoid assuming that effective speech is enough. All effective customer relationship programs capitalize not only on communication skills but also on building relationships.

What Are New Ways That Public Speakers Can Try?

How to be an effective public speaker
How to be an effective public speaker

Apart from the steps above, a relatively new way is embracing speech organization structures. The best speeches incorporate storytelling, so I recommend learning and implementing something called “The hero’s journey.” This will give you a framework to work from when building your speech.

The hero’s journey is a great way to engage your audience!

Another new trend is wearing the planned clothing for the scheduled presentation or meeting. Experts suggest that this helps the speaker be at ease and lessens self-consciousness.

In recent research, experts also encourage leaders to utilize video simulations. The advent of technology demands the familiarization of today’s leaders with advanced technologies as they grow into self-actualized leaders capable of delivering speeches regardless of topic, audience, and expected outcomes.

Another 2021 study suggests that focus group discussions (FGDs) can help leaders and their teams enhance their public speaking abilities. FGDs help leaders learn better organization and moderation of topics, including competencies such as impromptu questioning and meeting facilitation skills.

Here’s an insightful video of best-selling author, speaker, and organizational consultant Simon Sinek sharing his tips on how to improve your public speaking skills.

Captivate your audience with your public speaking skills.

Conclusion

From the rise of polis-states in Greco-Roman times to the revolutionary corporate presentations of Steve Jobs, one could not deny speech’s power in leadership roles.

Managers of teams big and small must develop the habit of working on the art of conversation, getting constant feedback, and observing the styles of other influential speakers.

What Is Adversity in Leadership? (For Small Team Leaders)


Leading through adversity

The military has one secret that most business leadership development programs don’t know or fully understand; without adversity, you cannot have influential leaders. Adversity is like a blacksmith forging steel; through the heat and banging of the steel, he creates ten times more robust and durable metal. So what is adversity for leaders and managers, and how can it improve your capabilities?

Adversity promotes growth for leaders who appropriately respond to it. Adversity in leadership is any obstacle or setback that challenges a leader’s capabilities. While adversity is commonly perceived as unfavorable, it can be beneficial for leaders to learn creative solutions to problems.  

Many of us think of adversity as a bad thing. However, in business (and life), there is a significant opportunity to use every setback to harden the “steel” of your leadership. Today I will discuss what adversity is in leadership, common examples of adversity, and traits of leaders who face adversity.

Adversity is like a blacksmith forging steel; through the heat and banging of the steel, he creates ten times more robust and durable metal.

What Does It Mean To Lead Through Adversity?

Leading through adversity is one thing a leader should have!

Leading through adversity means guiding others through difficult situations despite how challenging those situations may be. 

While leading this way takes many forms, in all instances, it involves high-pressure situations with risks involved. Further, the outcome of those situations will directly result in significant growth or detriment to a company. 

In the face of adversity, leaders must take certain risks and accept the consequences of their actions, regardless of the outcome. Because of the rugged nature of business, managers will also need to be flexible and adapt to new challenges. 

Additionally, while managers have to take necessary risks during adversity, they must remain calm and act out of reason rather than passion. 

All of these factors make leading through adversity incredibly challenging. However, this management form is also the most rewarding and provides the most growth for the individual and company.

No company has a direct trajectory to the top. All businesses face adversity. Leaders who use adversity to their advantage and overcome it generate the most growth for their companies.

I hate to say it, so I will sing it instead “what doesn’t kill you, makes you stronger” ( I promise, there are no more clichés in this article).

Here is Col Andy Anil sharing his own leadership experiences under adversity.

How to lead in the face of adversity

What Are Common Examples of Adversity in Leadership?

A Person In Adversity
A person in adversity cannot work responsibly.

Adversity comes in many forms, and knowing specific ways it can arise can help you respond to adversity appropriately and creatively. In general, adversity comes from personal, workplace, or environmental factors. 

Personal Adversity

Personal adversity arises when personal issues with direct employees are under your control.

Examples of this adversity type include: 

  • Health issues that prevent an individual from doing their job
  • Absentee or tardiness issues
  • Disrespect or direct insubordination

You can address these issues one-on-one with the employee and, in some cases, may result in their termination or transfer to a new job type (although I usually see this solution as a failure of leadership).

In these situations, it’s crucial to show empathy and understanding and be your employee’s friend who truly cares for them.

Be direct and transparent with your communication! Find a solution that aligns with your moral code and the company ethos. 

Workplace Adversity

Workplace adversity is the most common form and arises from issues within the business itself, such as cash flow problems. 

Examples of workplace adversity include: 

  • Financial issues
  • New ownership or an organizational merger
  • Increased competition from similar companies
  • High employee turnover rate or low employee morale

Leaders respond to workplace adversity by restructuring the organization, enacting new policies, or being creative with a functional alternative.

If the solution requires a new policy, layoffs, or structural changes, managers must also interact one-on-one or in team meetings with employees to inform them about the updates. 

While these changes will generally be unpleasant for employees, consider the business trajectory and make decisions that benefit in the long term.

Effective leaders have an eye for the future and are resilient in the face of dramatic changes. 

Environmental Adversity 

Environmental adversity is any challenge from an outside source that you cannot adequately prepare for or influence ahead of time.

Environmental adversity examples include: 

  • Natural disasters, pandemics, or other crises
  • Political or legislature changes
  • The introduction of a new and disruptive technology
Types of AdversitiesExamples of Adversities
Personal Adversity
Health issues that affect job performance, absenteeism or tardiness, and disrespect or insubordination towards the supervisor
Workplace AdversityFinancial problems, Organizational mergers or changes in ownership, Increased competition, and High employee turnover rate or low morale
Environmental AdversityNatural disasters, pandemics, or other crises, Political or legislative changes, and introduction of new disruptive technologies
Common Examples of Adversities

This adversity is incredibly challenging because there’s no way to prepare for the event or its aftermath. Leaders must be resilient and creative to develop appropriate solutions to these situations. 

What Are the Traits of Leaders Who Face Adversity?

A Leader Can Always Be Noticed With Their Leadership Traits
A leader can always be noticed with their leadership traits

Leaders who face adversity and grow from it are noteworthy individuals with several specific traits that help them weather the storm and rebuild to greater heights. These traits contribute to remaining calm under pressure, guiding others, and maintaining long-term goals. 

Leaders who face adversity and grow from it are noteworthy individuals with several specific traits that help them weather the storm and rebuild to greater heights.

The following are the most important traits of leaders who face adversity: 

  • Resilience: bouncing back from setbacks and maintaining a positive attitude. 
  • Adaptability: the ability to adjust rapidly to critical circumstances. 
  • Vision: seeing the big picture and business trajectory at all times. 
  • Courage: the ability to do the best for your company regardless of the risks involved. 
  • Strategy: knowing the risks involved and planning for them. 
  • Responsibility: owning decisions and accepting the consequences. 
  • Antifragility: never allowing damage to hurt you so bad you can’t get back up again.
Traits Of A Leader For Adversities
Traits of A Leader Facing Adversity

Individuals in management positions can adopt these traits to improve their leadership skills in adversity.

While we generally think of adversity as a setback of limitation, effective managers use adversity to grow themselves and others. They must be resilient during tough times and able to respond creatively to their situation. 

Further, these individuals not only react at the moment but also consider the long-term trajectory of their business. They have the vision to know where to go, the courage to see things through, and the strategy to mitigate risks so everyone benefits. 

Finally, leaders must be responsible for their actions and antifragile. Antifragility is a recent term popularized by Nassim Taleb that refers to systems that grow stronger from stress rather than weaker. 

Nassim also wrote the book Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder, it is a great read, and I recommend you get a copy if you want to understand better how to learn from adversity.

Antifragile leaders have strategies to grow or evolve in the face of adversity. These individuals are not only resilient when facing problems, but they also get better at facing those problems in the future. 

Conclusion

Most leaders are effective when things are going well. However, when faced with adversity, true leaders and managers stand out as a source of guidance. 

Adversity in leadership is any trial or setback that threatens the equilibrium of a business. Leaders who overcome adversity use these trials to improve their businesses and themselves. 

Adversity can take many forms, but it often involves a single person, an entire company, or environmental influences out of anyone’s control. 

Traits of leaders who face adversity and overcome it include adaptability, vision, responsibility, and antifragility. 

What Leadership Style Is Optimized for Clear Communication?


As a leader, you adopt a leadership style that dictates the atmosphere in your workplace and your relationships with peers and employees. You may develop your style organically, based on your personality, or choose it consciously, considering what works best. In any case, your leadership style should optimize the communication between you and your team.

Democratic leadership is one of the best leadership styles for clear communication. It entails seeking feedback and input from every team member to achieve a consensus. Therefore, it fosters effective and open communication. Other suitable leadership styles include affiliative and coaching.

If you want to know more, read the rest of this article. I will explain why the democratic leadership style is best for communication and cover additional ones that may also work. Moreover, I will go over leadership styles that hinder communication.

What is really the importance of language in small team leadership?

What Leadership Style Is Best for Communication?

What leadership style is best for communication?
What leadership style is best for communication?

There are so many leadership styles out there; whichever style you embrace determines your leadership career and your team’s relationship. Different leadership styles can work differently and may be ideal for various situations. However, you should adopt a technique that helps your communication with your employees rather than hinders it.

The best leadership style for clear communication is the democratic style. The democratic leadership style is based on making decisions with the participation of everyone on your team. This entails constant and open communication with every individual to get information and ideas from everyone. The communication lines should be available to achieve a consensus that everyone is satisfied with.

The democratic leadership style is based on making decisions with the participation of everyone on your team.

The democratic leadership style is one of the most popular and effective ones because it is based on the participation of every person on the team and the general consensus. By asking for the opinion and expertise of everyone to reach a decision, you build confidence in your team and motivate them to continuously improve at what they do.

As a democratic leader, you should keep open lines of communication with every team member to ask for their input and to provide your expertise. The basis of communication in democratic leadership is listening. By actively listening to the ideas and concerns of your team, you will be able to offer solutions and make a consensus decision.

By actively listening to the ideas and concerns of your team, you will be able to offer solutions and make a consensus decision.

How To Communicate as a Democratic Leader

Here are some tips that can help you improve your communication skills as a democratic leader:

  • Make sure to listen actively. Please pay attention to what every team member has to say and ensure they know their input is appreciated and utilized to make a decision.
  • Keep open lines of communication. Your leadership should show your team that they can always come to you for questions and concerns because they know that their opinion is valuable.
  • Seek feedback from your team. Ask for input and feedback from your team on your decisions and ideas. As a democratic leader, you should ensure you do what is best for your team.
  • Initiate the more difficult conversations. Sometimes, despite the open lines of communication, some team members may hesitate to talk to you in delicate situations; you should be the one to initiate conversations when nobody else will keep the lines open.

Other Leadership Styles That Help Communication

Leadership styles for better communication
Leadership styles for better communication

Besides the democratic leadership style, other styles can be great for the communication process between you and your team, as well as your peers or superiors. Let’s see what other leadership styles you can adopt to foster good and open communication:

Affiliative Leadership Style

The affiliative leadership style is based on the belief that the people come first. Affiliative leaders strive to help everyone on their team feel confident and capable, which translates to more productivity overall. This type of leadership is precious in less-than-ideal times when the team may be stressed or under pressure. 

An affiliative leader will keep the spirits up and inspire confidence even in the worst times. The leader should connect with every team member by listening and offering advice to everyone. Of course, this style requires clear and open communication all the time.

Coaching Leadership Style

Like the affiliative and democratic styles, coaching leadership focuses on the people more than the results. A coach-style leader seeks to help every team member to become the best version of themselves professionally.

Naturally, this style requires constant communication with everyone to realize their strengths and weaknesses and to understand how to improve them. The communication must remain transparent and open, allowing team members to give feedback if they feel your suggestions do not work.

Transformational Leadership Style

The transformational leadership style is quite challenging because it requires the leader to constantly think of ways to grow and improve the team’s work, which helps the company achieve better results. Transformative leaders need to be creative, strong, and great at communicating.

When constantly striving to grow and improve, you must know how to talk to your team members to get them on the same page. Asking someone to think outside the box or to push their boundaries can have undesired consequences if you don’t have an open and transparent line of communication. 

Types of good leadership
Leadership Style and DescriptionImpact on Communication
Democratic – Decision-making involves everyone on the team, open communication, and seeking feedback from everyoneFosters effective and open communication
Affiliative – Puts people first; focuses on building relationships and helping everyone on the team feel confident and capableRequires clear and open communication all the time; keeps the spirits up and inspires confidence
Coaching – Focuses on helping every team member become the best version of themselves professionally; requires constant communication and transparencyMust allow team members to give feedback if they feel the leader’s suggestions do not work
Transformational – Constantly strives to grow and improve the team’s work; requires creativity, strength, and great communication skillsMust have an open and transparent line of communication to get everyone on the same page
Different leadership styles and how they impact communication

What Leadership Style Hinders Communication the Most?

What leadership style hinders communication the most?
What leadership style hinders communication the most?

As you can see, you can choose plenty of leadership styles to foster good communication with your team, no matter your goal. Whether focused on the results, or the people themselves, you can have a great environment based on constant and open communication with your team.

Whether focused on the results, or the people themselves, you can have a great environment based on constant and open communication with your team.

However, certain leadership styles may hinder the communication between you and your team because of their nature. Here are some leadership styles you may not want to adopt if you want to have optimal communication in your workplace:

  • The Autocratic leadership style requires you to make decisions without asking for anyone else’s input and expect everyone to follow in line. Naturally, communication is not a priority for this style.
  • Laissez-faire leadership means letting your team members do what they think is best without offering much input. While this is less pressuring for your employees, it can also be less productive because there needs to be more communication between members to discuss optimizing their work.
  • Bureaucratic leadership is a style that is based on strictly following company rules and templates, offering little room for improvement. Bureaucratic leaders don’t foster an open environment because they tend to dismiss new ideas or concerns instead of sticking to company rules.  

Here is a video of Communication Coach Alexander Lyon discussing different Leadership Styles and their pros and cons.

Which leadership style or type of manager are you?
Leadership Style that hinders communicationExplanation
AutocraticMakes decisions without asking for anyone else’s opinion and expects to follow in line.
Laissez-faire Following the company rules and templates can hinder each member from improving.
BureaucraticFollowing the company rules and templates which can hinder each member from improving.
Leadership styles that can hinder communication

Conclusion

Communication is essential in any workplace and team, but not all leadership styles foster open communication. Suppose you want to optimize clear communication in your team. In that case, you should probably adopt a democratic leadership style, encouraging all team members to provide input and share concerns, thus creating an open line of communication.

Other similar leadership styles include affiliative, coaching, and transformational leadership. On the other hand, leadership styles to avoid if you want to foster good communication are autocratic, bureaucratic, and laissez-faire.

Testing Leadership Skills in Interview: Red Flags, Questions!


Testing Leadership Skills in interview: Red Flags, Questions!

I was once tasked with recruiting five new team leaders for our company; I thought this would be a walk in the park since I knew what made a good leader. I was quickly humbled when I realized there’s a difference between knowing what a good leader and what signs to look for during an interview is. Recruiters need to be able to accurately test leadership skills in an interview by asking the right questions and watching out for any potential red flags. So what’s the best way to gauge whether the candidate is suitable for the job?

To test leadership skills in an interview, you should ask several behavioral and situational questions about practical scenarios. The right candidate should show selflessness, an open mind, and an ability to accept criticism. Red flags include stubbornness, arrogance, and poor communication.

The right candidate should show selflessness, an open mind, and an ability to accept criticism.

There are many requirements that a good leader or manager should meet, which is why every organization should conduct thorough interviews that reveal as much of one’s personality traits and knowledge as possible. Read on below as I explore the best way to test leadership skills in an interview, including the best questions to ask and some signs indicating a good or an unfit leader.

How To Test Leadership Skills in an Interview

An Interview is the best way to see their skills
An Interview is the best way to see their potential skills

A good leader should possess a broad and complex range of qualities, so testing for leadership skills in a short interview is a challenging feat. However, if you manage to use your time right, you can differentiate between candidates with at least some managerial potential and those without.

Since leaders are expected to operate in a business world under constant change, they must be knowledgeable and adaptable.

However, how can you test someone’s adaptability with such a broad range of responsibilities? The best way to achieve that is to ask the right situational and behavioral questions. But an excellent way to assess someone’s managerial skills is to present different work-related scenarios and evaluate their reaction to them and their problem-solving skills.

While technical knowledge is still an essential part of a leader’s arsenal, you’ll mostly want to test a person’s soft skills during an interview. These include, but are not limited to, the following: 

  • Their ability to communicate ideas clearly
  • Delegate responsibilities
  • Keep calm during difficult situations
  • Put themselves in someone else’s shoes

That’s because it’s easier for candidates to lie about their soft skills, given that these are impossible to be backed up by a license or degree. 

So, while you can get a reasonably accurate idea of one’s technical knowledge by reviewing their diploma, the process is more challenging when assessing communication skills, creativity, or charisma, which are essential leadership skills.

A great way to judge whether or not a candidate possesses these qualities is to ask them how they’ve solved previous work-related issues or invent a potential scenario and ask for their input within a limited time frame.

The second approach can also help you more realistically determine how well the candidate performs under pressure.

Ask Behavioral Questions

Starting the interview with a few behavioral questions is an excellent way to determine their leadership skills. 

For example, you can ask them to give you an example of when they’ve led a group of colleagues toward success in a work project. You can also ask them to describe specific scenarios where they’ve shown *insert leadership skill here* in the workplace.

Though these questions seem superficial at first, they can give you a lot of insight into the candidate’s leadership skills and character.

For example, if you get a quick, generic answer, you’ll know it was probably rehearsed. 

Moreover, based on how the situation is re-told, you can assess several qualities other than those shown in the story. How a person recounts a story can give insight into their charisma, humility, and communication skills.

For me, it is crucial that I get the sense the candidate has reflected on the question previously or that they tell me, “I never thought about it before,” but they find that interesting.

I care less about the specific answer than I do about them showing the ability to reflect and think about leadership.

Ask Situational Questions

Then, you can follow up with some situational questions, asking the candidate to solve a hypothetical issue you present to them. Their problem-solving skills should become apparent once these questions are posed, and some candidates might even show impressive creativity in their responses.

However, try to focus on potential issues that might arise along the way and steer away from “gotcha” type questions designed to have the candidate fail.

Though all leaders should have excellent attention to detail, their primary responsibility is to see the bigger picture and lead their subordinates through real-life issues, and that’s what you want to test during the interview.

A great situational question that can help you assess the candidate’s managerial, organizational, problem-solving, decision-making, and collaboration skills is: 

What would you do if you faced X problem while on duty?

Though there won’t be a single right or wrong answer to the question you pose, the very nature of what the candidate says can give you a lot of insight into how prominent their leadership skills are.

This is also an excellent opportunity for them to show their communication skills. Can they clearly present their idea and angle of attack, or are they hard to understand?

For example, when they answer, they must first show that they can adequately communicate and delegate responsibilities. 

They also need to convince you that their problem-solving skills follow a growth mindset, meaning they need to be more process-oriented than goal-oriented.

If a candidate is too fixated on the end goal and doesn’t see what’s important along the way, that’s a red flag.

If a candidate is too fixated on the end goal and doesn’t see what’s important along the way, that’s a red flag.

You’ll want to look for candidates that give unique, creative questions. This will be easy to follow, though, as most interviewers are impressed by candidates who give out-of-the-box answers either way.

However, I’m reminding you that if you have a “right” answer outlined on your interview sheet, that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t be open to new potential solutions.

Another factor to remember is that while most leaders share some of the same qualities, they don’t follow the same path to success. This shows different leadership styles, and you must determine which one you’re looking for before interviewing candidates.

Depending on which source you rely on, you’ll find four to eight different leadership styles, each best suited to a specific situation. So, before crafting the interview, think about what your organization needs. 

Do you want a leader with a more direct management style or one that acts more as a coach? 

The former stays more confined to their duties, delegates their subordinates’ needs, and always operates around company-related goals. The latter, on the other name, true to their description, acts as a mentor to their subordinates, working along with them and helping them grow professionally.

These are just two leadership styles you’ll have to consider, so it’s best to outline the type of skills you want the candidates to possess immediately.

One company’s great manager might be another company’s downfall, so tread carefully when deciding what leadership style would work best with the dynamics that are already created in the workplace.

Ensure you recruit someone with a leadership style that adds value to your business instead of making the widespread mistake of recruiting someone whose leadership style is similar to yours! We like people who are similar to ourselves, but they may need to be a better fit in the big picture.

Ensure you recruit someone with a leadership style that adds value to your business instead of making the widespread mistake of recruiting someone whose leadership style is similar to yours!

What to ask?Importance
Soft skills
Soft skills like communication, delegation, problem-solving, and empathy should be tested in the interview
Technical knowledgeTechnical knowledge is important, and it is easier to evaluate than soft skills. Soft skills require situational questions and problem-solving tasks
Behavioral questionsBehavioral questions, like asking for specific examples of leadership, can give insight into a candidate’s leadership skills and character.
Situational questionsSituational questions should be open-ended and avoid ‘gotcha’ questions. They should focus on real-life issues that require problem-solving, decision-making, collaboration, and communication skills
Leadership styles
Different leadership styles suit different organizations, and it’s important to determine which style is best suited to your organization. Some candidates may fit better into a direct management style, while others may suit a more coaching-based approach.
How To Test Leadership Skills in an Interview

Now that you know more about the importance of asking behavioral and situational questions in testing someone’s leadership skills, it’s time to get down to the details and see which are some of the best quotations to ask during an interview that can help you determine whether someone is manager material.

Questions To Ask During an Interview

Questions To Ask During an Interview
Asking the right questions is important in testing leadership skills.

Here’s what you can ask a candidate during an interview for a managerial position:

  • How can you motivate your team? This question can give you much insight into one’s managerial style without you having to ask directly. How creative and open-minded are they? Do they know how to influence their subordinates’ morale? Do they have the ability to inspire? These are all answers that you’ll get by asking this question.
  •  How would you delegate task X? The purpose of this question is straightforward, and it can determine whether the person you’re interviewing is able to handle the more practical side of their position.
  • How do you measure your performance? The answer will let you know how the candidate defines success, their ability to be objective, and how well-equipped they are to see their shortcomings.

Other questions you can ask include:

  • Describe the best boss you ever had.
  • How would you solve a conflict between subordinates?
  • What’s your process when coming up with a new idea?

There’s a meme on social media today that demonstrates the difference between a leader and a boss. All the employees pull a heavy wagon in one frame, with the boss sitting on top with a whip.

But in the second frame, the leader is down with the employees, pulling the wagon. The lesson here is that a leader is there to help and motivate the team rather than tell everyone what to do without being willing to do it themselves.

Signs of an Unfit Leader, Red Flags

During the interview, there are several red flags you should pay close attention to. While some of these might not affect the performance of the average employee, when it comes to leaders and managers, they can be disastrous for the whole company.

With that said, here are some tell-tale signs of an unfit leader:

  • Selfishness: Contrary to popular belief, a leader needs to be the most altruistic person in a room, always thinking about the greater good rather than their own agenda. They also need to be humble to win the dedication and respect of their employees.
  • Excessive pride: A leader needs to accept that they can make mistakes just as much as anyone else and, therefore, must be open to constructive criticism. If a manager cannot see their faults, they’ll quickly lose not only the respect of their subordinates but also their control over the situation they’re dealing with.
  • Closed-mindedness: The main purpose of a leader is to see new growth potential and to help the company move forward, none of which can be achieved if the person in charge is closed-minded.
  • Absence of charisma: For a leader to be able to inspire, they need to be well-liked and respected, and someone who doesn’t make an impact on a personal level on the people they come in contact with simply isn’t fit to be a leader.
  • Inability to take suggestions: As mentioned, humility is one of the most essential characteristics of a leader. They need to be able to take advice and, when necessary, even accept that someone else’s solution to the problem might be better. They also need to be able to cut their losses when required and go in a new direction.
  • Tendency to micromanage: Though the job of a leader is to guide and help employees with their day-to-day responsibilities, a good leader should know when to give subordinates the independence they need to thrive.
Unfit Leader TraitsEffects on Leadership
SelfishnessLack of dedication and respect from employees, inability to prioritize the greater good
Excessive prideInability to accept mistakes and constructive criticism, loss of respect and control
Closed-mindednessInability to see new growth potential, hindering company progress
Absence of charismaInability to inspire and lead, lack of personal impact on employees
Inability to take suggestionsLack of humility, missed opportunities for better solutions, inability to adapt
Tendency to micromanageLimiting employee independence, hindering their ability to thrive
A table chart for unfit leadership traits

Signs Of a Good Leader

So, now that you know some of the qualities you’ll want to avoid in a potential leader, what characteristics actually show someone’s potential to lead with success?

  • Ability to inspire: A good leader should inspire and give courage to their employees; otherwise, their role only holds a little weight.
  • Ability to help employees improve their weaknesses without them knowing: A good leader acts like a coach, as they help you improve without having you feel bad about your shortcomings. Instead, they use positive reinforcement by focusing on your strengths as an employee.
  • Openness to change: A leader shouldn’t fear challenging the status quo. They should be the first to show an open mind and lead the company through positive change.
  • Good communication skills: A good leader should know how to communicate their needs and ideas properly. For subordinates to do a good job, they must know exactly what’s expected. No matter how brilliant a person is, their brilliance goes to waste if they can’t express themselves efficiently.
Signs of being a good leader
Signs of being a good leader

The Secret Sauce of an Effective Recruitment Interview

There is one secret to recruiting the right leader, and it goes against what I used to think. The biggest mistake I see small businesses make when recruiting is believing they can ask the right questions without understanding the candidate’s personality.

The biggest mistake I see small businesses make when recruiting is believing they can ask the right questions without understanding the candidate’s personality.

Interviewing someone who needs to understand their personality within the Big five is like asking a vegan what meat they recommend; the response you will get is more or less useful.

Chances are you will miss asking questions regarding the candidate’s actual disadvantages; it is also much more likely they can steer the interview in a direction that is in their favor, upping their strengths and downplaying their weaknesses.

A much better way is to have the candidate undergo a personality test so that they and you become aware of their behaviors. This will allow you to predict their conduct in particular situations reasonably accurately.

For example, if your candidate scored high on agreeable, ask questions to determine their suitability in a situation relevant to your business and if that’s a trait you want on your team.

You might also find indicators of narcissism, and from there, you can ask follow-up questions to determine its potential impact on your business.

There are a million different types of personality tests (for example, Myers-Brigg, which I have taken but don’t recommend).

The one I believe to be the most legit is understandmyself.com. It is created by Doctor Jordan B Petersen, author of “12 rules for life, an antidote to chaos” and a lifelong clinical psychologist.

Final Thoughts

Determining whether someone’s a good manager or leader from a single interview can be tricky, but the tips and approaches outlined throughout this article can help point in the right direction.

When interviewing someone for a leading position, it’s essential not only to ask the right questions but also to look for the right signs in their demeanor and how they carry themselves and communicate their ideas. A practical test can also help you get a better read on the candidate, though only experience can truly show one’s leadership skills.

Communicate During Change: 5 Steps to Employee Retention!


Communicate During Change: 5 Steps to Employee Retention!

At my old company, the attrition rate was high, too high. Usually, teams did one deployment and then broke up; my team stayed together for four years and did multiple deployments. This was all accomplished during a time of continuous change throughout the organization. Other teams had problems with employee retention, but we did not, and I largely attribute this to clear communication.

The steps to clear communication during change begin with the knowledge of the change among managers and leaders. Subsequently, employees are informed about the transformation’s what, how, and benefits. Use preferred channels until employees are successfully enlisted in the process. 

Getting people to adopt transformation can be challenging. I put together this article to give managers and leaders at the wheel of change processes a quick reference for change communication. Let’s start with the ‘how’ of communicating change.

What is really the importance of language in small team leadership?

How Do You Communicate Through Change?

How Do You Communicate Through Change?
Poor communication can ruin a project.

Routine and organizational culture can create a comfortable status quo that employees don’t want to be altered. For this reason, communicating through change can easily be met with resistance unless done clearly. Needless to say, poor communication can ruin a project.

Needless to say, poor communication can ruin a project.

Here’s a quick yet informative video on how to communicate effectively big changes to employees.

How to communicate Big Change to Employees

Managers should lead employees and stakeholders through a communication sequence to communicate through change. The sequence includes awareness, understanding, adoption, and commitment to the change. 

This communication continuum lays the foundation for the steps that leading and managing teams follow in communicating change. You’ll find those steps later in the article. 

When There Is Change, How Do We Communicate To Keep Performance High?

Communicating change must be done clearly.

The communication continuum mentioned above outlines how clear communication brings employees aboard the change process until they become active players. It also highlights the importance of communicating effectively, with high performance in mind.

Keep performance high during change by providing psychological stability through communication. Doing this primarily means making employees know that change is leading the company to better horizons and that their jobs are secure.

Keep performance high during change by providing psychological stability through communication.

When supported psychologically, employees will keep doing their best to keep their performance high. In addition, disruptions that characterize transformation will be overcome successfully.

It’s important that you communicate how the changes will benefit the employee!

When supported psychologically, employees will keep doing their best to keep their performance high.

Steps to Effective Communication During Change

How to effectively communicate changes to employees

Change does not affect itself. It is the people involved in running a company that put their knowledge and skills to realize change. If leaders don’t know why change is needed and how the management intends to work with employees to realize it, the efforts for the change are already null.

Managers and leaders should adopt the following steps to ensure clear communication during change. 

1. See the Change

You cannot communicate what you don’t know. For this reason, leaders and managers must first understand the change. Consequently, they can communicate it to employees and, together with them, effect it successfully.

An article by business and HR specialists, TLNT, suggests that issues related to management are the majority of the top reasons why organizational change fails. Leaders who cannot make a case for change create a clear path to failure.

Leaders who cannot make a case for change create a clear path to failure.

Managers will show they know about the change if they can communicate the following. 

  • What the change entails.
  • Why the change is required.
  • How the change will be realized.
  • Who will play what role in the change process?
  • Where in the company will the change happen?
  • When the change will happen.
  • What is the anticipated change outcome for the business and employees’ future job status?

2. Use Preferred Media and Senders To Communicate the Change

Change management involves the preparation of personnel to become change ambassadors. These change advocates communicate it to their teams and departmental colleagues.

However, employees have preferences about who should communicate the change to them. According to Rick Maurer, author of “Beyond the Wall of Resistance,” one of the three levels of change resistance is expressed in terms of “I don’t like you.”

Managers and leaders should be able to identify the right people that employees trust and from whom they would prefer to hear information about the change. Preferred change communicators could be an immediate supervisor or a team representative in the change management task force. 

In addition, managers and leaders should use varied channels to communicate change. They should likewise pay attention to what works best for individual employees. In this regard, change communication mediums can include the following. 

  • In-person meetings and forums
  • Emails and Newsletters
  • Videos and PPT presentations
  • Social media groups

3. Focus on the Benefits of the Change

Businesses are different from charity organizations for which people work without expecting any benefits for themselves. To fully engage in a change process, employees must be told what’s in it for them.

Managers and leaders should not just detail the benefits of change to the company. They should also communicate how the benefits will spill over to the employees.

Employee benefits from organizational change can come as follows. 

  • Better work resources such as innovative technology and other equipment make work easier.
  • Improved employee benefits like higher remuneration and insurance packages.
  • A restructured organizational culture accommodates the rapid global changes and makes employees fit better into the work context.

4. Answer Questions About the Change

At some point in the process of communicating change, employees will raise questions about what they know so far and what they still need to know.

Many questions may go back to some of the abovementioned steps, especially the “what’s in it for me” question. In this step, employees will get specific and seek to know the benefits of change for them as individuals.

For example, the leading or managing team may have explained in step 3 that employees will get salary increments from the change. At this point, employees may want to know if those in the accounting department will get the same percentage of salary increment as those in the HR department.

5. Persuade Employees To Adopt the Change

To get employees to bring their glasses together to toast change implementation, managers and leaders must persuade them that the change is worth pursuing. Persuasion will be achieved by getting all four steps above right. 

However, the following additional tips can help convince your team to adopt change:

  • Demonstrate past success related to change implementation so employees can see it’s doable. Where no records exist, present success cases for benchmarking. 
  • Clearly outline the role of each team member in effecting the change. No one will be interested in organizational transformation where they are mere spectators. 
  • Once you initiate the change process, consistently update teams about the progress of change implementation. Updating the teams will keep members focused on the eventual goal of the change process.

Overall, bear in mind that communication and motivation go hand in hand. You’ll need both to keep the usual company roles on track while implementing change.